Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Lemuel Brown v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 19-2004
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] FILION, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager Grievance Section, Office of Legal Affairs, [UNKNOWN] LAPLANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEMUEL D. BROWN
Paul Graham v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 19-2413
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL R. GRAHAM
United States of America v. Graham et al
as 8:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Waylon Leo John Wiest, Julie R. Graham and Courtney L. Wiest
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Corse v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00294
Plaintiff:
Walter Corse
Defendant:
C. Trigg, R. Graham, C. Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown #192709 v. Woods et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, Unknown Millette, Unknown Dunton and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel D. Brown #192709
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv01411
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Petitioner:
PAUL R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitley v. Graham Jr.
as 8:2018cv02188
Respondent:
R. Graham Jr.
Petitioner:
Dana Sylvester Whitley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. Graham et al
as 6:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Travell D Harvey
Defendant:
Kevin R. Graham, Steven W. Hemphill and Jeffrey Catoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Robinson (Humphrey)
as 18-1143
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darren Charles Robinson, AKA Mountain, Darren Charles Robinson, AKA Mountain, Darren Charles Robinson, AKA Mountain and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Marty Humphrey
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
David R. Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
