Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Richardson v. Forsyth County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Robert Richardson
Defendant:
Forsyth County Sheriffs Office, Forsyth County, Sheriff Ron Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rawlins v. City of Anderson et al
as 2:2021cv00567
Defendant:
City of Anderson and Robert Richardson
Plaintiff:
Robin Rawlins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrard et al v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv04706
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Hon. Michael B. Parker, Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Richardson and Carol garrard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00788
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Richardson, Chad Jacob Ballew and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Hannon v. Genereaux et al
as 4:2017cv40022
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Hannon
Defendant:
David Genereaux , James Smith , Justin Piccirillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Elbert v. Gilbert Carter, et al
as 16-4077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard M. Elbert
Defendant - Appellee:
Gilbert Carter, Police Officer, Francis Collins, Police Officer, Andrew Dorothy, Sgt. and others
Richard Elbert v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, et al
as 16-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard M. Elbert
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri Police Department, Police Officer Muhlbauer, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe, City of KCMO Office of Regulated Industries
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
