Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SCOTT v. PYROLYX TIRE RECYCLING, LLC d/b/a PREFERRED TIRE RECYCLING ET AL
as 2:2024cv00477
Defendant:
Pyrolyx Tire Recycling, LLC d/b/a Preferred Tire Recycling and Rodney Rogers
Plaintiff:
Spencer Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROGERS v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
rodney rogers and RODNEY R. ROGERS
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MITCHELL v. DE LA CARRERA et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL
Defendant:
DE LA CARRERA and RODNEY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chase Weiss v. Bowling Green State University, et al
as 22-3941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASE WEISS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY, CHRISTOPHER BULLINS, JEREMY ZILMER and others
John Doe v. Bowling Green State University
as 3:2022cv00140
Defendant:
Bowling Green State University, Christopher Bullins, Jeremy Zilmer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60588
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11808
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AARON RODNEY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rogers v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv12735
Plaintiff:
D. Rodney Rogers
Defendant:
Ryan, Sabbi, Serina Kelley and others
Whole Hog Cafe Inc v. RBR Investments LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00361
Plaintiff:
Whole Hog Cafe Inc
Defendant:
RBR Investments LLC and Rodney Rogers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
