Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Republic Telecom Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Republic Telecom Services, Inc. and Luis Lorenzo Barrios
Plaintiff:
Niesha S Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Christian Thomas
as 21-1159
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTIAN S. THOMAS
THOMAS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01481
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP S THOMAS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnette v. Schmaling et al
as 2:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Patricia Hanson, Christopher Schmaling, Wynne Laufenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03334
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03151
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00993
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
THOMAS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv04696
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN S. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Webb et al
as 5:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Gray
Defendant:
Senior Wardens, FNU Duttine, S Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
