Cases 11 - 20 of 159
Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
as 22-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Defendant / Appellee:
KURT L. SCHMOKE, in his official and individual capacities, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, in her official capacity, JOSEPH S. WOOD, in his official and individual capacities and others
Griffin v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis, Tiffany Turner, Jennifer Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Gary S Woods
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WOODS v. RAWLEY et al
as 1:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Gibbs et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
Casey Gibbs, M. Carroll, Joseph Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WOOD et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09559
Plaintiff:
BARRY S WOOD and JANICE WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Wood and Eric S Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WOODS v. RAWLEY
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS, II
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Woods
Defendant:
L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
