Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smoot v. Pestana et al
as 5:2026cv00490
Plaintiff:
Ladonna Smoot
Defendant:
Christian Pestana and Olga De La Hoz Homes LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Buck v. Spencer et al
as 3:2026cv50176
Plaintiff:
William Buck
Defendant:
Spencer, N.P. Tuell, Forbes and others
:
Scanning Joliet Treatment Center and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smoot v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv01830
Plaintiff:
Dallas R Smoot
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smoot Investments Inc. v. Singularis Animus Asset Management Corp et al
as 1:2026cv01227
Plaintiff:
Smoot Investments Inc.
Defendant:
Singularis Animus Asset Management Corp, Ahron Schachter, Ahron S. Schachter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Smoot v. Dr Delanto et al
as 1:2026cv00321
Plaintiff:
Josephus Smoot
Defendant:
Dr Delanto and RN Joplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enoch v. Smoot et al
as 1:2026cv01882
Plaintiff:
Derri Enoch
Defendant:
Deonna Smoot, IDOC, Gage and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smoot et al v. Hoyle et al
as 4:2026cv00123
Plaintiff:
Shylisa Smoot and Jerry Webb, II
Defendant:
John Hoyle, Jr., Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Smoot Investments Inc. v. Sam Maintenance Service Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00868
Plaintiff:
Smoot Investments Inc.
Defendant:
Sam Maintenance Service Inc. and Shmuel Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
