Cases 1 - 10 of 421
Frazier v. McCastle et al
as 4:2024cv00876
Defendant:
Hudson, Kashonda Thompkins, Lafeyette Woods, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oneal v. McCastle et al
as 4:2024cv00877
Defendant:
Redix, Rodney Allen, Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Oneal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. McCastle et al
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Zachery Hartley
Defendant:
Lafeyette Woods, Jr., Hudson, Rodney Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Zachery Hartley
Defendant:
Thompkins, Hudson, Kieara Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00808
Defendant:
Rodney Allen, Tiger Commissary, Lafeyette Woods, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00802
Defendant:
Ellis, Washington, McCastle and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00766
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Thompkins, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUBBARD et al v. THE CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00103
Defendant:
CLAY BLACKBURN, TOBY GERKIN, BRENT THOMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
SONDRA HUBBARD and SHAYNE HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompkins v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01761
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Toronzo D Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Marshall, Randall, Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.