Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17374
Plaintiff:
TONYA KING
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adrian Nicholson v. TitleMax of Virginia, Inc.
as 22-2007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, AIMEE EDWARDS, ALMA CARTER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Jones v. Martin et al
as 7:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Lora Stanley, Teri Wilke, Dr. Marcia J. Odal and others
Plaintiff:
Carl David Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
King v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America (TV1)
as 1:2019cv00324
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Tonya King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01921
Plaintiff:
Tonya King and Alec King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
Tonya King
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tonya King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
King v. Village of Southern View et al
as 3:2013cv03009
Defendant:
Village of Southern View and Joseph Zeid Langan
Plaintiff:
Tonya King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
