Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Frank Visser v. Vitamin Shoppe Inc, et al
as 22-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK VISSER
Defendant / Appellee:
VITAMIN SHOPPE INC
William R. Visser v. Medical Device Business Services Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
William R. Visser
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, C. SHEETS, S. JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Jessop et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Barry Allen, Robin Allen and Kendra Visser
Defendant:
Carlyn Jessop, Orval Bringhurst, Sunrise AG Development, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
James Douglas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ford v. Handybros Services LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
Lionel Ford
Defendant:
Handybros Services LLC and David Visser
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VISSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55472
Plaintiff:
ERIC P VISSER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Guerin v. Sam Visser Makeup, Inc.
as 2:2021cv07570
Plaintiff:
Charles Guerin
Defendant:
Sam Visser Makeup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Berkshire #371645 v. Payton et al
as 1:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Randy Berkshire #371645
Defendant:
Sherry Payton, Dara Johnson, Shane Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Visser v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2021cv02418
Plaintiff:
Robert Visser
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Visser, Jr. v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv03612
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Fredric Visser, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
