Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Mark Duncan v. Shirley McKinney
as 18-1090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. DUNCAN and IRIS S. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY, ROBERT MCKINNEY, SARAH HUDSON and others
Dickson v. Former FBI Director James B. Comey Jr. et al
as 4:2018cv00002
Defendant:
Northampton Community Center, Ms. Lisa Taylor, John/Jane Doe (s) Employees and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
ENCARDONE v. WALMART CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv13796
Plaintiff:
JANICE ENCARDONE
Defendant:
WALMART CORPORATION , JOHN DOES (I-V) and ABC COMPANIES (I-V)
Cross_claimant:
WALMART CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
ABC COMPANIES (I-V) and JOHN DOES (I-V)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Delima v. Walmart Corporation
as 5:2017cv05244
Plaintiff:
Krystal Megan Delima
Defendant:
Walmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNCAN et al v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
MARK J. DUNCAN and IRIS S. DUNCAN
Defendant:
SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY, ROBERT MCKINNEY, SARAH HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Walmart Corporation
as 4:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Campbell
Defendant:
Walmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Farmer v. WalMart Corporation et al
as 6:2017cv01482
Plaintiff:
Denice Farmer
Defendant:
WalMart Corporation, Walmart Coos Bay Oregon and Walmart Newport Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. WALMART CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv05745
Defendant:
WALMART CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-10
Plaintiff:
MARYANNE JOHNSON and JAY JOHNSON
Cross_claimant:
WALMART CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
