Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Antonio Witherspoon v. Dorothy Incarvito-Garrabrant
as 26-2777
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO K. WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
DOROTHY M. INCARVITO-GARRABRANT, Judge Atlantic County Superior Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WASHINGTON v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2026cv00656
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CO BRYANT, CO HENDERSON, CO FROPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHERSPOON v. INCARVITO-GARRABRANT
as 1:2026cv07960
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO K. WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
DOROTHY INCARVITO-GARRABRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nigel Parms v. Allegheny County Facility, et al
as 26-2341
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY FACILITY, ZOLLER, DAVID, Inmate Account Property and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv02137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Minkoff v. Frontieras North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03628
Plaintiff:
Alysse Dee Minkoff
Defendant:
Frontieras North America, Inc., Matthew McKean, John Venners and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Witherspoon v. New York Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv02614
Plaintiff:
Astle Witherspoon
Defendant:
New York Police Department, P.O Nicholas Cruz, P.O Malek Sulieman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
