Cases 41 - 50 of 826,558
Auth Token LLC v. Guaranty Bank & Trust, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Guaranty Bank & Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Auth Token LLC v. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rosario v. Legal Aid Justice Center
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Diane Cristina Rosario
Defendant:
Legal Aid Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huffman v. Woods et al
as 7:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Woods, Osborne, S. Gullett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Tina N. George
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
QBE Specialty Insurance Company v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
as 1:2024cv21854
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI, Joe Carollo, Arthur Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cowgill v. Bland
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
Estella Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2024at00588
Plaintiff:
Jessica Miller, S. H. and Anna Miller
Defendant:
County of Shasta, Alicia Endecott, David Hendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Defendant:
Vladimir S. Vasquez and CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
