Cases 51 - 60 of 826,562
Rosario v. Legal Aid Justice Center
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Diane Cristina Rosario
Defendant:
Legal Aid Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huffman v. Woods et al
as 7:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Woods, Osborne, S. Gullett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jason M Hart
Defendant:
Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and Audrey Cavins-Ezell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Tina N. George
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
QBE Specialty Insurance Company v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
as 1:2024cv21854
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI, Joe Carollo, Arthur Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cowgill v. Bland
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
Estella Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024at00387
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant:
Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bettis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Lee Bettis, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
