Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae: New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chambless Enterprises L L C et al v. Redfield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01455
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Nina Witkofsky, Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Plaintiff: Chambless Enterprises L L C and Apartment Association of Louisiana Inc
Amicus Curiae: National Medical Association, Danya E Kenne, Emily A Benfer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Skyworks, Ltd., et al v Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv02407
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Nina B. Witkofsky and others
Plaintiff: Cedarwood Village Apartments I & II Owner B, LLC, Monarch Investment and Management Group, Toledo Properties Owner B, LLC and others
Petitioner: Julia Raifman, Sabriya A Linton, Community Legal Aid Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California v. Azar et al Featured Case
as 3:2019cv01184
Defendant: Alex Azar, Health and Human Services, Secretary and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff: State of California Attorney General's Office and State of California
Petitioner: Essential Access Health, Inc., Chris Sevier and Dr. Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01103
Defendant: Office of Population Affairs, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Diane Foley, M.D. and others
Plaintiff: Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Amicus Curiae: Arkansas, Alabama, Susan B Anthony List and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae: Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?