Cases 61 - 70 of 17,612
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Rafiyq Davis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Thomas Jacobi Allen v. US
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. JACOBI ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LULAC v. Abbott
as 24-50449
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas
Damon et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Damon Damon, Damon Ricardo Brown and Christie Damon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald W. Park v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Park
Defendant:
United States and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Courtney Richmond
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Trooper Jordan Anderson, Officer Kevin Krohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
COPELAND, MD v. TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS et al
as 2:2024cv06687
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, MD
Defendant:
TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS, EILEEN LUKAS, WALLACK, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
