Cases 1 - 10 of 6,446
Bitler
as 5:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bitler, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. City of Memphis, TN et al
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
Mark White, Sr. doing business as Tokyo Nights
Defendant:
City of Memphis, TN and Paul Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Defendant:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nevarez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Robert Nevarez, Sr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Tempe, City of, Peter Klepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keys v. Busey Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Busey Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
