Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Wood v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023mc09002
Petitioner:
Craig Michael Wood
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bohannan v. Williams
as 23-40018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Bohannan
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Williams, TDCJ-CID Warden II, Anthony Newton, TDCJ-CID Warden I, Kevin Smith, TDCJ-CID Warden I and others
Petty v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Garon Jaquez Petty and Gavon Jaquez Petty
Respondent:
Michael Wood, Steve Marshall and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Woods
as 1:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Myles Xavier Smith
Respondent:
Michael Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren et al v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv02200
Plaintiff:
Diamond Warren and Robert Yates
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
Anthony Reynolds, Major Russell Garman and Zach Stortz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WOODS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv00273
Defendant:
GARY, KONKLE, BAZINSKI and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv02220
Defendant:
GREG EATON, RICHARD BROWN, GIAGIACOMO and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00473
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mary Lloyd, James Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Redic et al
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Charles Rowry, Kevin Smith, Bryan Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
