Cases 61 - 70 of 3,499
Green v. Vitani et al
as 6:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lamar Green
Defendant:
A. Vitani, S. Garcia, L. Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria v. Palmer
as 5:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamar Victoria
Respondent:
Warden John Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamar Benton v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BENTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Green v. Vitani et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lamar Green
Defendant:
A. Vitani, S. Garcia, L. Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mellem et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Sgt Mellem, CO Johnston, CO Bemish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sorber et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Lamar Brown
Respondent:
Jaime Sorber, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Adams County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Lamar Lee
Defendant:
Shane L. Wiseman and Caruthersville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
MERLE ROSS WEBB
Defendant:
KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
