Cases 1 - 10 of 4,279
(PC) Montgomery v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Jonlynn S. Montgomery
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, William R. Ridgeway, Justice Center Probate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks, Carl v. Officer Wheeler
as 1:2024cv21865
Plaintiff:
Carl Banks
Defendant:
J. Officer Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Angelo Banks
Defendant:
Officer Owens, Officer Thornberry, Officer Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Banks
as 24-6073
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL EUGENE BANKS, AKA Bird, AKA Birdie, AKA Tiny Bird
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
