Cases 1 - 10 of 1,039
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Shock et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Shaleen Cecile Manning
Defendant:
Andy Shock and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Casel
as 24-10360
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cecil Charles Casel, also known as CC
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
