Cases 31 - 40 of 202
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $13,312.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 2:2021cv00347
Defendant:
STRUM RUGER RIFLE, CAL .223, S/N 196-15829, $13,312.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, $68,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 12006 N. Oakhurst Way, Scottsdale, AZ, 85254
as 2:2020cv02420
Defendant:
12006 N. Oakhurst Way, Scottsdale, AZ, 85254
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $27,699.76 Seized from Citizens Bank Account # XXXXXX5852 et al
as 5:2020cv00353
Defendant:
$27,699.76 Seized from Citizens Bank Account # XXXXXX5852, $521.95 Seized from Citizens Bank Account # XXXXXX8712 and $3,454,76 Seized from Citizens Bank Account # XXXXXX1902
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
George N. Ibe and Patricia Ibe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA et al v. a.One ATV Yamaha Raptor 700, 2BG00 Y-6; et al
as 3:2020cv01273
Defendant:
b.One ATV Apollo Commander, L08AGJ2DOJ1000186;, p.Jewelry, Gold Color Necklace with a Charm Milany;, y.Jewelry, Gold Color Necklace with one round shaped charm; and others
Plaintiff:
USA and i.iPhone (Gold), Green & Clear Cover;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. 2019 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG-S, et al
as 2:2020mc00072
Defendant:
Approximately $3,325.00 Seized from Lamassu BTM Located at 14701 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, California, Approximately $1,712,611.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately 18.12902639 Bitcoin and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. 2019 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG-S, VIN: WDDZF8KB8KA608709, California License Number 1UEV351 et al
as 2:2020at00320
Defendant:
Approximately $3,325.00 Seized from Lamassu BTM Located at 14701 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, California, Approximately $1,712,611.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately 18.12902639 Bitcoin and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Funds in Fidelity Investment Account No. 637-409820 held in the name of Rajendra Bothra (approximately $12,195,220.59) et al
as 2:2019cv13558
Defendant:
27426 Seyburn, Warren, MI 48092, 27330 Seyburn Ave., Warren, MI 48092, Funds in Fidelity Investment Account No. 637-409820 held in the name of Rajendra Bothra (approximately $12,195,220.59) and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ronald/Mary Kufner
Counter Claimant:
Scott S Yaldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. One ASUS Laptop Computer S/N C2N0AS407004088
as 1:2019cv23486
Defendant:
ONE ASUS LAPTOP COMPUTER S/N C2N0AS407004088
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Gregory Chandler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0781
United States of America v. Approximately 34 acres, et al.
as 5:2019cv06110
Defendant:
Approximately 34 acres Described as the N 4 acres of the E 5 acres of the NE of the NE Section 12, Township 58 N, Range 27 W and Part of the SW of Fractional Section 6 and Part of the NW of the NW, Approximately 92.45 acres described as the E of the SW and the W of the SE of Section 20 EXCEPT 15 feet of the East side of the W of the SE lying North of the Road, all in Township 47 N, Range 1 and Approximately 52.15 acres described as the S of the NE of the NE of Section 9, Township 50 N, Range 19 W of the Fifth Principal Meridian in Saline County, Missouri, also the N of the SE of the N
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real property situated at 433 4-H Lake Drive, Daniels, Raleigh County, West Virginia
as 5:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Real property situated at 210 Parkwood Drive, Beckley, Raleigh County, West Virginia, Real property situated at 433 4-H Lake Drive, Daniels, Raleigh County, West Virginia and Real property situated at 219 N. Eisenhower Drive, Beckley, Raleigh County, West Virginia
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
First Community Bank and Natalie Cochran
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
