Cases 101 - 110 of 1,024
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reid v. Dobbs
as 9:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobbs v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Eric Allen Dobbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sgt. Branch, G. Shook MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Sanford v. US
as 22-7450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Warden Brian K. Dobbs)
Dobbs v. Citizens Bank
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kristy Dobbs
Defendant:
Citizens Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation v. Athens Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation f/k/a People's Capital and Leasing Corp., M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation and People
Defendant:
Athens Inc., Anthony Dobbs and Grand Canyon Destinations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coger v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Mark Coger, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Dobbs and Mike McMeems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. SEFCU
as 1:2022cv01228
Plaintiff:
Kristy Dobbs
Defendant:
SEFCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schaefer v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dobbs, FNU Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
