Cases 111 - 120 of 42,899
Moore v. D.O.C.
as 7:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Marvin Maurice Moore
Defendant:
D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steptoe, David et al v. Thorpy, Michael
as 3:2024cv00578
Defendant:
Michael Thorpy
Plaintiff:
David Steptoe, Ebony Moore and Brittany Pridgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Smith v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv02405
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Gov. Larry Hogan, Sub Dir. Hilary Siakor-SicLeaf and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Masterson et al
as 6:2024cv00300
Defendant:
Eddie Moore, Timothy Nichols and Donald J. Masterson
Plaintiff:
Julie E. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv01283
Petitioner:
David Allen Moore
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Tellez et al
as 4:2024cv05175
Defendant:
Alejandro Tellez and S. Moore
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Restaurant Supply Chain Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00471
Defendant:
Michele Esselman, Kathleen O'Neal, Restaurant Supply Chain Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RANDOLPH v. MOORE et al
as 2:2024cv01173
Defendant:
Jason Takacs, Cassandra Frenk, Gene Holdren and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yohannes et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv02087
Defendant:
David Crutchfield, Pamela Conn, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Edmon Yohannes and Tesfai Haggmana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Johnson (McCallum)
as 24-2143
Defendant:
JAMES JOHNSON, Flizzy, GERALD MARTIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
