Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Ellis v. Earls et al
as 2:2017cv04138
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellis
Defendant:
Alan Earls, Doug Prudden, Jeffrey Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellis
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning et al v. Arnold et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Manning and Cornelius Ivy
Defendant:
Trevor Arnold, Gregg Rosenberry, Jason Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
ELLIS et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 1:2014cv04460
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA E. ELLIS and BRIAN ELLIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DOUGLAS , UTILIMAP CORP. and JOHN DOE I-III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Brian Valbert v. SC Dept. of Mental Health
as 13-7562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN ELLIS VALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, GAYLAN SANDERS, Mr., HAROLD ALEXANDER, Mr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TEMPAY INC. v. MENTORS OF AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01662
Defendant:
BRENT ELLIS, JR., BRIAN ELLIS, HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TEMPAY INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Valbert v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2012cv01973
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellis Valbert
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, Gaylan Sanders, Harold Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Cate et al
as 1:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellis Porter
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, M. D. Biter, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
