Cases 11 - 20 of 46
William Miller v. Jason Dyer, et al
as 19-11392
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HAPEVILLE and JASON DYER, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY MILLER
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Patel et al
as 1:2017cv04169
Defendant:
Kamalesh Patel and Christopher McCoy
Plaintiff:
John Henry Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Dyer et al
as 1:2016cv04625
Plaintiff:
William Henry Miller
Defendant:
Jason Dyer and City of Hapeville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Love et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
Keith Love , Edward Akers , Brice Altman and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH , Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv07557
Plaintiff:
Henry Miller
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYATT v. MILLER
as 2:2016cv00123
Defendant:
JACOB HENRY MILLER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WYATT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYATT v. MILLER
as 2:2016cv00084
Defendant:
JACOB HENRY MILLER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WYATT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Henry Miller v. Katy Poole
as 15-7207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HENRY MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATY POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, YOLANDA COVINGTON and others
MILLER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY MILLER
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, YOLANDA COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
