Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Gaskins et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv25890
Plaintiff:
Teresa Gaskins and James M. Gaskins
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASKINS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2014cv01208
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. GASKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tatum et al v National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
John L. Outlaw, Artis Houston, Horace Copeland and others
Defendant:
NFL Productions, L.L.C. and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DERP et al v. GASKINS-TIBERS
as 1:2012cv01394
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DERP and NICOLE DERP
Defendant:
YOLANDA M. GASKINS-TIBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASKINS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv65183
Plaintiff:
CECIL R GASKINS and HANNAH M GASKINS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madrid v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2010cv02031
Plaintiff:
Anna Madrid
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services , Maricopa County Sheriff's Office , M Lugo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elam et al v. Sorey et al
as 3:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Linda C. Elam, Linda C. Elam, Randy E. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Christopher V. Sorey and Smyrna/Rutherford County Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaskin et al v. Hobgood
as 2:2008cv04284
Plaintiff:
John M. Gaskin and Rhonda Gaskin
Defendant:
Arthur C. Hobgood
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
