Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Nelson v. Ruth Star Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00550
Defendant:
Melaku Demis, Ruth Star Inc and Ruth Star Inc d/b/a Daniel Trucking
Plaintiff:
Sarah Beth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. CLEGG et al
as 2:2019cv00085
Defendant:
STEVEN CLEGG, SARAH BETH, SARAH BETH CLEGG and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Bank & Trust v. Complete Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04123
Plaintiff:
First Bank & Trust
Defendant:
James Garrett Connor, Sarah Beth Connor and Complete Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FULKERSON v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2018cv00047
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SARAH BETH FULKERSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meckley v. USA
as 1:2016cv00232
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sarah Beth Meckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv15162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Xavier Worthington v. Rose Palmer
as 15-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XAVIER WORTHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSE PALMER, Esquire, Court-Appointed Guardian and Conservator for Clyde H. Segear [Deceased] and Alice B. Segear, BON SECOURS, ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, CASTLE REAL ESTATE, INC. and others
US v. Sarah Meckley
as 15-4778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SARAH BETH MECKLEY
Worthington v. Palmer et al
as 3:2015cv00410
Defendant:
Rose Palmer, Bon Secours - St. Mary Hospital, Castle Real Estate, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Worthington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
