Cases 31 - 40 of 83,566
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Haral v. Greene County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Haral
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Dr McGreevy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Great Harvest Franchising v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Great Harvest Franchising
Defendant:
Gregory Andrew Williams Green and Kimberly Elaine Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Black v. Adolf et al
as 5:2024ct03112
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Peter Adolf, Alan Ellis, Noell P. Tin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SpiritBank v. Keatrin Foods LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
SpiritBank
Defendant:
Keatrin Foods LLC and Ketrica Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WHITESELL-GREEN INC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
WHITESELL-GREEN INC
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Barry v. LaManna
as 24-1272
Petitioner:
MAMADOU BARRY
Respondent:
Superintendant LAMANNA, Green Haven Correctional Facility
HARDAWAY v. GREEN EGGS CAFE
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
GREEN EGGS CAFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Greene v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
as 2:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
