Cases 31 - 40 of 477
Williams-Grogans v. Dejoy et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Maquary Del'Shawn Williams-Grogans
Defendant:
Louis Dejoy, Angelene Rainey, Danielle L. Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grogan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Fredrick Wayne Grogan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan v. Bobby
as 5:2022cv00274
Petitioner:
Juan Romero Grogan, Jr.
Respondent:
David Bobby and Warden David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grogan v. McGrath RentCorp
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Robert Grogan
Defendant:
McGrath Rentcorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Menard v. First Source Federal Credit Union et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Francis D. Menard
Defendant:
First Source Federal Credit Union and Debarah A. Grogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childs v. Grogan
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Childs
Defendant:
Brian Grogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. McConchie et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain also known as Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu doing business as Brandako, Inc, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu, Manetirony Clervrain and others
Defendant:
Dan McConchie, Jim Durkin, Ronna McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grogan et al v. Truist Bank
as 8:2021cv02732
Plaintiff:
Mark Grogan and Lisa Grogan
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
