Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 54
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae: Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff: Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff: State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
In Re: Prempro Products et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2003cv01507
Defendant: Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Abbott Laboratories, Warner Lambert Company LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: New York Times Company
Trustee: Rex Kyle
Respondent: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Special Master: Hon. James Rosenbaum
In Re: Prempro Products Liability Litigation
Intervenor: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff: Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae: American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff: American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03040
Plaintiff: State of Washington, Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Diane Foley and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Essential Access Health, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv01195
Plaintiff: Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Amicus Curiae: American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?