Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GARDNER v. JACOBS
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BOYD GARDNER
Defendant:
JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Neal v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00830
Petitioner:
Charles Boyd Neal
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd et al v. Orrin B. Hayes, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd and Sonjalita Boyd
Defendant:
Orrin B. Hayes, Inc., Orrin B. Hayes, Inc., Amy Krone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyd v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2008cv02705
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Zag Intl, Inc v. Island Cement, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00908
Plaintiff:
Zag Intl, Inc
Defendant:
Island Cement, LLC, Charles Harlan and Charles Boyd
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. 123.62 ACRES et al
as 1:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and others
Defendant:
123.62 ACRES, WILLIAM HARVEY HEGARTY, CONSTANCE BOYD HEGARTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Boyd v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-63990
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
-BNB Lachkovich v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Lachkovich
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Benjamin Nighthorse Campbell, Thomas Strickland and others
Interested_party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
