Cases 31 - 40 of 2,634
Bracken v. Warden, FCI McDowell
as 1:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Bracken
Respondent:
Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Winn v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Defendant:
FBOP and FCI McDowell
Plaintiff:
Alshabazz Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bumpas et al v. Missouri Housing Development Commission et al
as 4:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Fred Van Noy and Paul Bumpas
Defendant:
Vivek Malek, Steve Whitson, Mark Elliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Amco Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00626
Defendant:
Amco Insurance Company and Dyan McDowell
Plaintiff:
Barbara Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Richard v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2024cv00419
Defendant:
Will Bankston, Sid Gautreaux, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MCDOWELL v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2024cv02523
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTAIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
DARIUS MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03451
Defendant:
Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kolta v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03804
Defendant:
Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kolta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Perry v. Briseno et al
as 1:2024cv00542
Defendant:
Michael B. Murphy, Unknown Sherrick, Carri Briseno and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillip Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
