Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,937
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff: JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant: TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Travis Scott Almer
Defendant: Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Queen v. Hanson
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff: Yasmin Queen
Defendant: Howard Hart Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
InTrustment Northwest, Inc. v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: InTrustment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant: Wellpath, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Vivek Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Boykins v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner: Hanson Boykins
Respondent: Tim Hooper and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Dulgov We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00664
Petitioner: Denise Dana Hanson
Respondent: A. Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Rae et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff: Brandon Whitaker
Defendant: Mark Rae and Russell Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hanson v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Michael S. Hanson
Respondent: Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
King et al v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Sarah King, Godspeed Hollow Farm, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant: Lisa Charpilloz Hanson and Wym Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?