Cases 41 - 50 of 8,039
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
HERBERT v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv03794
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE HERBERT
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers #200836 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dewon Rogers #200836
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Jeff Tanner, Wayne Thomas, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Herbert v. ASI Lloyds
as 24-30147
Plaintiff:
Alvin Herbert and Jennifer Herbert
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Progressive Property Insurance Company
Battise v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Herbert Battise, III
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HERBERT v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chance Herbert
Defendant:
TONY SKINNER, OFFICER FOX, OFFICER KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
