Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Ferguson v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ralph Lynn Ferguson, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Marcine Dunn, Charles Willis, Josh Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAYERS et al v. HAUSFELD, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv02005
Defendant:
HAUSFELD, LLP, LOCKS LAW FIRM, LLC, ZIMMERMAN REED LLP and others
Plaintiff:
SAYERS, ERIC HIPPLE, JERRY RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mixson v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 0:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Joseph Catlin Mixson and Virginia Breann Mixson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mixson v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2015cv04555
Petitioner:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Director, Charleston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Westfield Insurance Company v. KMAC of the Carolinas Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03672
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
KMAC of the Carolinas Inc, Samet Corporation and Flats at Mixson LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America Ex Rel et al v. Davita, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02509
Plaintiff:
United States of America Ex Rel, Alon J. Vainer, Daniel D. Barbir and others
Defendant:
Davita, Inc., Gambro Healthcare, Inc., Gambro AB and others
Respondent:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP, Gibbs & Bruns and Grant J Harvey
Petitioner:
Union County Dialysis, LLC, Vainer & Vainer Nephrology Consultants, Inc. and Dialysis of Georgia, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
James Richard Tetley, II
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Howard v. Mixson
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kortez Dayvone Howard
Defendant:
Mixson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson v. State of California
as 3:2015cv00878
Petitioner:
Raymond E. Mixson
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
