Cases 51 - 60 of 9,663
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw et al v. Q&D Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Bergit Shaw and Dockum Shaw
Defendant:
Q&D Construction, LLC and County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Norman Shaw, Jr. v. Wayne Memorial Hospital
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHAW, JR.
Defendant:
WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
SHAW v. USA
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS SHAW
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Shaw v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 4:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shaw
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. v. Legard
as 24-537
Plaintiff:
NEVILLE, RODIE AND SHAW, INC.
Defendant:
E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, As Executor of the Estate of Edwin F. Legard, Jr.
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03678
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
VICKI SHAW
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shaw v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00751
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Patrick Shaw
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
