Cases 51 - 60 of 39,487
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant:
KEVIN WELLS, BILL EDDINS, TERRY TERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubin v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02258
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Rubin
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Terry v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lonja Terry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brock et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leroy Allbaugh, Craig Brewer, Michael Brock and others
Defendant:
City of Bellingham and Seth Fleetwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lakey, et al v. Duggan, et al
as 24-7053
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LAKEY and DOUGLAS LAKEY, as co-Special Administrators for the Estate of Jared Lakey
Defendant:
DAVID DUGGAN, in his individual capacity, JOSHUA TAYLOR, BRANDON DINGMAN, in his individual capacity and others
Davis v. Contreras
as 4:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
T. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaulieu v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Shelby County Commission, The, Chad Scroggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison #151760 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Garrison
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
