Cases 51 - 60 of 118
USA v. Shawn McCrorey
as 14-3838
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN I. MCCROREY, aka William Dean aka Harry Anthony aka Harry Atonio aka Chino Dean aka Michael Dean aka Wiiliam L. Dean aka So Sito aka Jorge Soto aka Michael Dean Sotto aka Den William aka Harry Soto aka Dean Michael Sotto aka Jo J. Tocorrea
CARPENTER v. USA
as 1:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DEAN CARPENTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Pierce
as 5:2014cv03272
Petitioner:
William Dean Pierce
Defendant:
//
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Main et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19063
Plaintiff:
Peggy Main and William Dean Main
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv01182
Plaintiff:
William Dean Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Dean v. City of Monticello
as 0:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
William Dean
Defendant:
City of Monticello
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dean v. New Orleans Mission
as 2:2014cv00261
Plaintiff:
William Dean, Sr.
Defendant:
New Orleans Mission
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Lawson et al v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
William Dean Lawson and Joey Brown
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuggle v. Dies et al
as 5:2013cv02908
Plaintiff:
William Dean Tuggle, Sr
Defendant:
Eustace L Edwards , Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co and David F Dies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHAPMAN et al
as 2:2013cv05648
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
WILLIAM DEAN CHAPMAN, JR., ALEXANDER CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and ALEXANDER FINANCIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
