Cases 61 - 70 of 243
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goad v. Bell
as 9:2019cv00965
Petitioner:
Gary G. Goad and Gary Glen Goad
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, NOAH SNIDER, DOUGLAS ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC and CorrectCare Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon Owens and Shannon Goad Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Goad v. Gary Steel, et al
as 19-50568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GOAD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE DIBRELL W. WALDRIP, DOES 1-10, Inclusive, LORI LIANE LONG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOAD et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20189
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GOAD and DONNELLA GOAD
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. David C. Goad
as 5:2019cv00564
Defendant:
David C Goad and David C. Goad
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOAD et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 2:2019cv12547
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GOAD and DONNELLA GOAD
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
