Cases 61 - 70 of 8,498
Coffelt v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay Coffelt
Defendant:
Rick White, Holmes and Principle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Eric DeJuan Jones
Defendant:
Vanessa Jones, Joseph L. Turney, George T. Holmes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beach v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Deputy Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOLMES v. FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
DOMINIQUE J. HOLMES
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officers, Eureka Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
