Cases 81 - 90 of 428
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00774
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
Kathy Hubb and Aramark Food Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv03114
Plaintiff:
Chimel Witherspoon
Defendant:
Aramark Food, B.C.D.C., Baltimore Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Baltimore County Executive et al
as 1:2020cv03044
Defendant:
PrimeCare Health Inc., Baltimore County, B.C.D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Khiry D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Abbott v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2020cv01597
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Waukesha County Jail and Correctional Officer Hoskins
Plaintiff:
Richard Dell Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv03022
Defendant:
B.C.D.C. and Aramark Food Company
Plaintiff:
Cody Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ikpe v. Aramark et al
as 4:2020cv00788
Defendant:
Aramark Services, In Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Food and Sup Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Facility Ser Aramark Facility Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stephany M. Ikpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv02716
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc., Aramark Food, B.C.D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrrel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McKenzie v. Winnebago County Sheriff et al
as 3:2020cv50352
Defendant:
Winnebago County State's Attorney, Rick Ciganek, Winnebago County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00461
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
