Cases 81 - 90 of 611
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. OOSHIRTS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02519
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas and ANDY
Defendant:
ooShirts, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Doe #9 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
John Doe #9
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croom v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv00896
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Josh Schoenbeck, Terrence Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wenzke v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wenzke
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Does #1 - #8 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Consolidated Plaintiff:
John Doe #3, John Doe #2, John Doe #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Graham
as 21-1801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robinson
Defendant / Appellee:
Harold D. Graham, Superintendent, John Doe #1, Correctional Officer, John Doe #2, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant:
John Doe #6, Inmate, John Doe #7, Inmate, John Doe #8, Inmate and others
Coway et al v. Romero et al
as 6:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
katja coway and Morgan marks
Defendant:
Thomas Romero, Anthony Green, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
