Cases 1 - 10 of 2,562
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Kalama School District et al
as 3:2024cv05335
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Amos
Defendant:
Kalama School District, Billina Dolezal, Tiffany Fechter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Loraine v. Steuben County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Edward Loraine
Defendant:
Steuben County Sheriff, Braxton Amos, Shane Matchette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pittman v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02267
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Shanitha Pittman
Defendant:
Michael Amos Harris, M.A.D.E. Creations, Inc., RJ Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
TENNEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
GEORGE AMOS TENNEY, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. McMurray et al
as 1:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Renee Walker
Defendant:
Ashaun S McMurray and Carl Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lizana v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lizana
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Troy Peterson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
