Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bivings (PS) v. Hammer et al
as 1:2026cv02907
Plaintiff:
Kayla Shafontay Bivings
Defendant:
Gretchen Hammer, Amanda Lofgren and Colleen Batchelor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
PARADIGM TRANSPORTATION, LLC v. BATCHELOR & KIMBALL, INC.
as 2:2026cv00878
Plaintiff:
PARADIGM TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Defendant:
BATCHELOR & KIMBALL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Batchelor et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04187
Plaintiff:
William R Batchelor
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnie Oliver, Jr. v. Ronnie Batchelor, et al
as 26-11599
Plaintiff:
JOHNIE OLIVER, JR.
Defendant:
JUDGE RONNIE K. BATCHELOR, GWINNETT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, AUGUSTA SMP WARDEN and others
Lanham, Jr. v. Batchelor et al
as 2:2026cv00527
Plaintiff:
Darrel Lanham, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert J Batchelor, James R Skelton, Krista Stoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aidoo v. Batchelor et al
as 1:2026cv02032
Plaintiff:
Betty Aidoo
Defendant:
Senior Judge Ronnie K. Batchelor, Asset Funding Group, LLC, Vimal Modi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WALKER v. POPE et al
as 5:2026cv00132
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN WALKER
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER POPE, SGT JORDAN, WARDEN PEOPLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd Jennison v. Robert Batchelor, et al
as 26-3305
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. JENNISON
Defendant:
ROBERT J. BATCHELOR, BENJAMIN E. HALL, JEFFREY MULLEN and others
Batchelor v. BKF Engineers et al
as 4:2026cv02623
Plaintiff:
Kristina Batchelor
Defendant:
BKF Engineers, BKF Engineers/AGS and BKF Engineers/Telamon Joint Venture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
