Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Briskie v. Briskie
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Briskie
Defendant:
Scott E. Briskie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Charles Sheppard v. Jasmine Korus, et al
as 24-2114
Defendant:
JASMINE KORUS, PHILLIP BRISKI, DANA MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Briski v. Wythe County, Virgina et al
as 6:2024cv00770
Defendant:
Wythe County, Virginia and Deputy Sheriff C.D. Wright
Plaintiff:
William Briski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Defendant:
Captain Andrew Hinchman, Robert Kesling, Matthew Brisky and others
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Misner et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Misner, Officer Phillip Briski, Officer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #210974 v. Parish et al
as 1:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Grayling Trigg Smith #210974
Defendant:
Les Parish, Jennifer Dalton, R. Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Abbott, Meagan Albert, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al vs. Beech-Nut Company
as 1:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Abbott, Erin Abdoo, Krystal Leigh Anderson and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
