Cases 1 - 10 of 6,954
Burton v. USA
as 4:2025cv00605
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dewayne Burton
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burton v. United States Government et al
as 4:2025cv00606
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dewayne Burton
Defendant:
United States Government and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
BURTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv10682
Plaintiff:
SERITA BURTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gross (ID 58894) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2025cv03116
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Gross
Defendant:
Hazel Peterson, Mona Coffey, Gerald LePlatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2025cv00934
Plaintiff:
George Gould
Defendant:
Brian Sullivan, Keith Wortz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy-Taylor v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2025cv00935
Plaintiff:
Mary Murphy-Taylor
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Brian Sullivan, Keith Wortz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv10097
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BURTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Burton v. USA
as 3:2025cv01478
Petitioner:
Joshua Mazique Burton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
