Cases 41 - 50 of 68
PARKER v. PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01384
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. , STUART PELTZ and SHANE KOVACS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parker v. Davis et al
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Daniel Parker
Defendant:
Hubert Davis, Unknown Keys, Unknown Burg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Christopher James Parker, et al v. Spokane County, et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Estate of Christopher James Parker , Daniel Parker and Lori Parker
Defendant:
Spokane County , Ozzie Knezovich , Kerrie Fernland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv05673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moffat, Marilyn et al v. Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy
as 3:2015cv00626
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Moffat , Karen Kemmis , Danielle Parker and others
Defendant:
Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Parker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Curry Daniel Parker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31025
Plaintiff:
Curry Daniel Parker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv01002
Petitioner:
Daniel Parker
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 6:2014cv06599
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashcraft et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02308
Plaintiff:
Juliann Ashcraft , Claire Caldwell , Krista Carter and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Arizona State Forestry Division , Yavapai, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
