Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walker v. Fayette County Schools et al
as 2:2019cv02562
Defendant:
Diane Watkins, Jane Doe, James Teague and others
Plaintiff:
Tametrius Walker
Not Yet Classified:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlie et al v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07017
Plaintiff:
Leah T Williams, Demoine D Gross, Lisa A Simoneaux and others
Defendant:
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
TEAGUE et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2017cv12562
Plaintiff:
JAMES TEAGUE and NORMA TEAGUE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEAGUE et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:17-cv-12562
Plaintiff:
JAMES TEAGUE and NORMA TEAGUE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Sherif Philips v. North Carolina State
as 17-2186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERIF PHILIPS, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA AGENCY and others
Monroe v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Seth Monroe
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Does, Frank Jeff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherif Philips v. North Carolina State
as 16-1119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERIF PHILIPS, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA AGENCY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
