Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv13744
Plaintiff:
JOAN BELL and ROBERT BELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01234
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11446
Plaintiff:
Joan Bell and David Bell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv01084
Plaintiff:
Joan Bell
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, James Brown, Dennis R Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07634
Plaintiff:
Pamela Joan Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bunderson v. In Re Estate of Dena Joan Bell
as 2:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Bunderson
Defendant:
In Re Estate of Dena Joan Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 0:2013cv02181
Plaintiff:
Joan Bell and David Bell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
YOCUM v. HERMICK et al
as 2:2012cv01530
Plaintiff:
SEAN YOCUM
Defendant:
RHONDA HERMICK , STEPHANIE SOMOGIE , CASEY JENNINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv03671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
