Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Devlin v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joseph Devlin
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stanley Friedler v. Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc.
as 22-1895
Petitioner / Appellant:
STANLEY FRIEDLER, MD, GAIL FRIEDLER, RICHARD FRIEDLER and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED and COLEMAN JOSEPH DEVLIN
Friedler et al v. Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Petitioner:
Stanley Friedler, M.D., Gail Friedler, Richard Friedler and others
Respondent:
Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc. and Coleman Joseph Devlin
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
DevlinIn re: Devlin
as 20-1351
Appellant:
In re: DANIEL JOSEPH DEVLIN, IV and KEVIN P. EATON
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Devlin v. Friendly Cab Co.
as 4:2016cv10072
Plaintiff:
Joseph Devlin
Defendant:
Friendly Cab Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
TILLERY v. RODREGUEZ et al
as 2:2014cv06685
Plaintiff:
KAREEM TILLERY
Defendant:
DEBRA RODREGUEZ, KILLIMET, JOSEPH DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odemena v. Devlin et al
as 1:2014cv12591
Plaintiff:
Martin Odemena
Defendant:
Joseph Devlin and Massachusetts School of Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILLIE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv03473
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BAILLIE
Defendant:
THOMAS MCFADDEN and JOSEPH DEVLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Local Billing, LLC v. Webbilling.com B.V. et al
as 2:2008cv03083
Defendant:
Joseph Devlin, Does, Frans Lamers and others
Plaintiff:
Local Billing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Local Billing, LLC v. Webbilling.com B.V. et al
as 2:2008cv02203
Plaintiff:
Local Billing, LLC
Defendant:
Webbilling.com B.V., Frans Lamers, Michael Reul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
